Inform the
admissions process
Understand the skills
profile and variances within
the student population
Quantitatively track the
development of skills
over time
Identify needs and inform
instructional intervention
Benchmark performance
against comparable institutions
Measure the efficacy of
interventions
Critical Thinking & Problem Solving
Benchmark Average 65.13%
Skills included the ability to assess the strength and validity of claims, evaluate evidence, draw accurate conclusions, define problems accurately, identify strategies for problem solving and identify patterns.
Information Literacy
Benchmark Average 53.92%
Skills included framing research questions, identifying biases in data, analyzing and synthesizing information and the ethical use of information.
Communication
Benchmark Average 49.96%
Skills included awareness of context and purpose, organization and structure of communication and use of the appropriate tone and vocabulary.
SUBSKILL
Skill strand: Evaluate information and its sources critically
This is a key skill for independent research and responding to unseen passages in assessments. The top quartile in the cohort is performing at a very high level. The weakest section of students needs instructional intervention, typically in the form of scaffolded exercises for independent reading and research. Students will benefit from explicit instructions in strategies for evaluating sources of information.
INDIVIDUAL LEVEL STUDENT DATA
ALIGNED TO P21
AND ATLS
TEST ABILITIES
ONLY
ROBUST
ASSESSMENT
DETAILED DATA
INSIGHTS
NO WAY TO BEAT
THE TEST
INSTRUCTIONAL
SOLUTIONS